RODGERS v. CZAMANSKE

No. WD 46254.

862 S.W.2d 453 (1993)

Curtis RODGERS and Linda Rodgers, Appellants, v. Daniel M. CZAMANSKE and Scott Orr, Respondents.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

September 21, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerard D. Eftink, Van Hooser, Olsen & Eftink, P.C., Kansas City, for appellants.

Samuel Preston Williams, Williams & Barzee, Kansas City, for respondent Czamanske.

James P. Barton, Jr., Myerson, Monsees & Morrow, P.C., Kansas City, for respondent Orr.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and HANNA, JJ.


BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

Curtis and Linda Rodgers appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Daniel Czamanske and Scott Orr in a legal malpractice action. The Rodgers raise one point on appeal alleging that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because of the existence of genuine issues of material fact. The judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for trial.

This case is the third case arising out...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases