MITCHELL v. BURNT MOUNTAIN LOGGING

91-14771; CA A78818.

865 P.2d 440 (1993)

125 Or. App. 278

In the Matter of the Compensation of Thurman M. Mitchell, Claimant. Thurman M. MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. BURNT MOUNTAIN LOGGING and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 8, 1993.

Review March 8, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Harri, Eugene, argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on the brief was Malagon, Moore, Johnson, Jensen & Correll.

Steven Cotton, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause, for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen. and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and DURHAM, JJ.


Review Held in Abeyance March 8, 1994.

PER CURIAM.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order holding that the hearings division lacked jurisdiction to review his claim for reimbursement of travel expenses that he incurred in the course of medical treatment. We review for errors of law, ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(7), (8), and reverse.

Employer argues that ORS 656.704(3),1 and ORS 656.327(1)(a),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases