CITY OF LITTLETON v. STATE

No. 92SC40.

855 P.2d 448 (1993)

The CITY OF LITTLETON, Colorado, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Colorado; the Board of Land Commissioners of the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Colorado; and the State Board for Community Colleges and Occupational Education, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

July 6, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry W. Berkowitz, City Atty., City of Littleton, Barry A. Segal, Littleton, for petitioner.

Gale A. Norton, Atty. Gen., Raymond T. Slaughter, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Timothy M. Tymkovich, Sol. Gen., Patricia S. Bangert, Paul Farley, Deputy Attys. Gen., Antony B. Dyl, Jerry W. Goad, First Asst. Attys. Gen., David F. Steinhoff, Michael W. Schreiner, Asst. Attys. Gen., Denver, for respondents.

Charles H. Richardson, Jr., City Atty., City of Aurora, Michael J. Hyman, Aurora, for amicus curiae City of Aurora.

Steven J. Roy, City Atty., City of Fort Collins, W. Paul Eckman, Fort Collins, for amicus curiae City of Fort Collins.

Daniel E. Muse, City Atty., City and County of Denver, Steven J. Coon, Denver, for amicus curiae City and County of Denver.

Joseph N. de Raismes, III, City Atty., City of Boulder, Walter W. Fricke, Jr., Thomas M. Christensen, Boulder, Geoff Wilson, Gen. Counsel, Mun. League Kathleen E. Haddock, Denver, for amici curiae City of Boulder and Colorado Mun. League.


Justice KIRSHBAUM delivered the Opinion of the Court.

In City of Littleton v. State of Colorado, 832 P.2d 985 (Colo.App.1991), the Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment dismissing a civil action filed by the petitioner, the City of Littleton, Colorado (hereinafter the City), against the respondents, the State of Colorado, the Board of Land Commissioners of the Department of Natural Resources of the State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases