ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Schnucks appeals the trial court's ruling denying its claim for unjust enrichment against Puller for $7,632. We affirm.
We find the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by written order...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.