Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
There is no merit to defendant's contention that the proof at trial was insufficient to establish that the value of the stolen vehicle was in excess of $3,000 at the time the crime was committed. The owner testified that the vehicle was purchased new for $9,000 approximately nine months before it was stolen and that it was in "perfectly fine" condition. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
