SMART v. WINSLOW

No. 07-92-0112-CV.

868 S.W.2d 409 (1993)

Don M. SMART, Appellant, v. Richard L. WINSLOW, M.D., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.

December 31, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Windle Turley (David R. Weiner), Dallas, for appellant.

Gwinn & Roby, Charles G. Bell and M. Steve Nagle, Dallas, for appellee.

Before REYNOLDS, C.J., and BOYD and POFF, JJ.


REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

Aggrieved by the instructed verdict rendered in his medical malpractice action against Dr. Richard L. Winslow, Don M. Smart contends with nine points of error that the trial court erred in excluding all the testimony and quashing the depositions of his designated expert witnesses and instructing a verdict for Winslow. Agreeing that the instructed verdict for abuse of discovery was extreme, we will reverse the judgment and remand the cause.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases