ROUSE v. FMC CORP. MARINE-RAIL

89-25719; CA A72479.

846 P.2d 429 (1993)

118 Or. App. 25

In the Matter of the Compensation of James A. Rouse, Claimant. James A. ROUSE, Petitioner, v. FMC CORP. MARINE-RAIL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas D. Hagen, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief, for petitioner.

Karen O'Kasey, Portland, argued the cause, for respondent. With her on the brief was Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order that held that employer had not accepted claimant's personality disorder as a compensable condition. We reverse.

While working for employer in 1979, claimant sustained a compensable injury to his right knee. He had surgery and returned to work. Determination orders issued in 1980 and 1981 awarding him temporary total disability (TTD) and permanent partial disability (PPD). In early...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases