MARATHON NAT. BANK v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.

Docket No. B075592.

19 Cal.App.4th 1256 (1993)

24 Cal. Rptr.2d 40

MARATHON NATIONAL BANK et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; RICHARD CAMPBELL, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

October 28, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

David B. Bloom for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Lang, Hanigan & Carvalho and John D. Lang for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.

The question in this case is whether a trial court must hold a hearing before acting upon a discovery referee's report. We hold that the trial court must independently consider the referee's findings and any objections submitted by the parties before accepting or rejecting the referee's recommendations but that this may be done in whatever manner the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases