1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 865 P.2d
  5. 865 P.2d 409 (1993)
 

FAESSLER v. TURNEY

WCB 92-00587; CA A78400.

865 P.2d 409 (1993)

125 Or. App. 134

In the Matter of the Compensation of Joseph A. Turney, Claimant. Charles FAESSLER and Geraldine Faessler, Petitioners, v. Joseph A. TURNEY and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 8, 1993.

Review Denied February 22, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chess Trethewy, Salem, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Garrett, Hemann, Robertson, Paulus, Jennings & Comstock.

Edward J. Harri, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Joseph A. Turney. With him on the brief was Stanley Fields.

Steve Cotton, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent SAIF Corp. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and DURHAM, JJ.

RIGGS, Judge.

Employers seek review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board determining that claimant's injury was within the course and scope of his employment and therefore compensable. We affirm.

The Board found that employers, who are claimant's stepfather (Faessler) and mother, operate a dairy farm. In November, 1989, claimant was working full time for them as a farm laborer. Saturday was claimant's regular...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases