1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 994 F.2d
  5. 994 F.2d 277 (1993)
 

U.S. v. REECE

No. 92-3736.

994 F.2d 277 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald REECE, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided April 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry Lehmann (argued and briefed), Office of the U.S. Atty., Cincinnati, OH, for plaintiff-appellee.

W. Kelly Johnson (argued and briefed), Miller & Rosewald, Cincinnati, OH, for defendant-appellant.

Before: NORRIS and SILER, Circuit Judges; and HOOD, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents yet another challenge to the distinctions in the federal drug laws between offenses involving cocaine and offenses involving cocaine base (crack). Defendant Reginald Reece pled guilty to distributing four ounces of crack, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). Knowing he faced a mandatory minimum sentence of ten years imprisonment for such an offense, Reece reserved in the plea agreement the right to challenge, on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases