1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 850 S.W.2d
  5. 850 S.W.2d 413 (1993)
 

GARRITY v. A.I. PROCESSORS

No. 18299.

850 S.W.2d 413 (1993)

Mark GARRITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.I. PROCESSORS, Defendant-Respondent, and William Orsinger, Defendant.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One.

April 9, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gene A. Hilton, Camdenton, for plaintiff-appellant.

W. Gary Drover, Camdenton, for defendant-respondent.

CROW, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff, Mark Garrity, filed a three-count petition. Count I sought damages from "A.I. Processors"1 ("AIP") for breach of contract. Count II sought damages from William Orsinger ("Orsinger") for allegedly inducing AIP to breach its contract with Plaintiff. Count III sought damages from Orsinger and AIP for allegedly conspiring with each other to deny Plaintiff the benefits of his contract with AIP.

AIP...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases