CHAPMAN v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

CA A72560.

846 P.2d 409 (1993)

118 Or. App. 11

Anthony M. CHAPMAN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony M. Chapman, Salem, filed the brief pro se.

Charles Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem, filed the brief, for respondent.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and DE MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review, under ORS 183.400, of the validity of OAR 291-97-015(1) and (2), a Department of Corrections administrative rule governing prison term reductions. He contends that the rule is invalid because it exceeds the authority granted to the Department under ORS 421.121(1) and (4).

ORS 421.121 provides:

"(1) Except as provided in ORS 137.635, each inmate sentenced to the custody of the department for felonies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases