STATE v. MOE

No. C9-92-2027.

498 N.W.2d 755 (1993)

STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Charles Lyle MOE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 13, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Kenneth J. Kohler, Nobles County Atty., Michael V. Tow, Asst. County Atty., Worthington, for appellant.

Robert A. Darling, Worthington, for respondent.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and DAVIES and AMUNDSON, JJ.


OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

The state challenges the trial court's determination that respondent, Charles Lyle Moe, was not in "physical control" of a motor vehicle and the court's subsequent dismissal of the complaint for lack of probable cause. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Police officer Kevin Dather responded to a report of a pickup truck mired on the shoreline of a lake. Upon the officer's arrival...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases