SMITH, HINCHMAN AND GRYLLS, ASS'N, INC. v. TASSIC

No. 92-1211.

990 F.2d 256 (1993)

SMITH, HINCHMAN AND GRYLLS, ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED; The Smith Group, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. William P. TASSIC, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided April 6, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Sullivan, Martha B. Goodloe (briefed), Bodman, Longley & Dahling, Troy, MI, Hollis T. Hurd (argued), Pittsburgh, PA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Patrick J. Burkett (argued and briefed), Daniel D. Swanson, Sommers, Schwartz, Silver & Schwartz, Southfield, MI, for defendant-appellee.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; and NORRIS and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.


MERRITT, Chief Judge.

This case requires us to determine the res judicata effect of a state court ruling on ERISA preemption. The district court found that the issue of ERISA preemption presented here was fully and fairly litigated in the Michigan Circuit Court and could not be collaterally attacked. Consequently, it dismissed plaintiffs' cause of action for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases