1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 985 F.2d
  5. 985 F.2d 258 (1993)
 

U.S. v. ONE MACOM VIDEO CIPHER II, SN A6J050073

No. 91-4146.

985 F.2d 258 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ONE MACOM VIDEO CIPHER II, SN A6J050073, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Anthony E. Goldberg, Claimant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided February 3, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin R. Conners (argued and briefed), Office of the U.S. Atty., Columbus, OH, for plaintiff-appellant.

Max Kravitz (briefed), Janet E. Kravitz (argued), Columbus, OH, for defendants-appellees.

Before: NELSON and SILER, Circuit Judges; and MILES, Senior District Judge.

SILER, Circuit Judge.

The United States of America ("government") filed a forfeiture action under 18 U.S.C. § 2513 (1988) against certain electronic devices which were used, sent, carried, manufactured, assembled, possessed, sold, or advertised in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 ("ECPA"), specifically 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511 and 2512. The district court granted claimant-appellee's, Anthony E. Goldberg's, motion to dismiss for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases