1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 988 F.2d
  5. 988 F.2d 247 (1993)
 

U.S. v. BELL

No. 92-1969.

988 F.2d 247 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Richard Harmon BELL, Defendant, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided March 9, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sarah Jennings Hunt, for defendant, appellant.

F. Mark Terison, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, ME, with whom Richard S. Cohen, U.S. Atty., Augusta, ME, was on brief, for U.S.

Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

This appeal asks, essentially, a single question: Must a district court, at a reconvened sentencing hearing following a defendant's successful appeal, reexamine its explicit findings and conclusions on an issue not raised in the appeal and which the defendant had previously acknowledged to be correctly decided? Because we do not believe that the district court is under so wide-ranging an obligation, we affirm the judgment below.

I.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases