MARIO BUATTA CORPORATION v. FORD

No. 92-0017.

616 So.2d 618 (1993)

MARIO BUATTA CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Kathleen D. FORD, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 14, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis L. Hamby, III, Alley, Maass, Rogers & Lindsay, P.A., Palm Beach, for appellant.

L. Frank Chopin and John C. Mattimore, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, Palm Beach, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

POLEN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

POLEN, Judge, concurring specially.

I agree with the majority's per curiam affirmance of the trial court's dismissal with prejudice of appellant's claim as a sanction for appellant's repeated discovery violations. This court stated in Mercer v. Raine, 410 So.2d 931 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), aff'd...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases