Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
The suppression court did not err in refusing to suppress physical evidence seized from defendant after a stop of his vehicle. The detailed information supplied by two unnamed informants, including a description of defendant, his clothing and the vehicle he would be driving, corroboration by the police of information that defendant was driving without a license and an officer's observation of a person matching defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.