PENICK v. CADO SYSTEMS OF CENT. ALABAMA

1921202.

628 So.2d 598 (1993)

Henry L. PENICK v. CADO SYSTEMS OF CENTRAL ALABAMA, INC., et al.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 19, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry L. Penick, pro se.

J. Haran Lowe, Jr. and David L. Rawls, Birmingham, for Cado Systems of Central Alabama, Inc. and Cognition Technology Corp.

James C. Barton, Jr. and Scott W. Ford of Johnston, Barton, Proctor, Swedlaw & Naff, Birmingham, for General Elec. Capital Dealer Distributor Finance, Inc., formerly known as Contel Credit Corp., Inc.


SHORES, Justice.

This case presents an issue of first impression: whether a compulsory counterclaim is an "action" for purposes of Alabama Code 1975, § 6-5-440, which bars a plaintiff from prosecuting two actions in the courts of this State at the same time for the same cause and against the same party. We hold that it is. We affirm in part and dismiss in part.

Two cases were filed on the same day in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, both based upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases