Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant argues that reversal is required because a Sandoval hearing was held in his absence. We are unable to review that contention; the stipulated record makes no reference to a Sandoval hearing. The court's finding that the undercover investigator had an independent basis for his in-court identification of defendant is supported by the record (see, People v Burgos,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.