FORSCHNER GROUP, INC. v. ARROW TRADING CO., INC.

No. 92 Civ. 6953 (LAP).

833 F.Supp. 385 (1993)

The FORSCHNER GROUP, INC., and Swiss Army Brands, Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. ARROW TRADING CO., INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 29, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nims, Howes, Collison, Hansen & Lackert, New York City by Oliver P. Howes, Jr., Karen P. Clancy, for plaintiffs.

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., New York City by Louis S. Ederer, Paul R. Levenson, for defendant.


OPINION and ORDER

PRESKA, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, The Forschner Group, Inc., and its subsidiary Swiss Army Brands, Ltd. (collectively "Forschner"), bring this action against Arrow Trading Co., Inc. ("Arrow"), for violation of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (1988), and for unfair competition under New York common law. Forschner, a distributor of Swiss Army knives in the United States, seeks to enjoin Arrow from advertising...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases