GREENBERG v. MAHONEY ADAMS & CRISER, P.A.

No. 91-2699.

614 So.2d 604 (1993)

Leonard E. GREENBERG and Arnold C. Greenberg, Appellants, v. MAHONEY ADAMS & CRISER, P.A., et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Hanzman of Zack, Hanzman, Ponce & Tucker, P.A., Miami, Albert N. Proujansky, Boynton Beach, for appellants.

Edward A. White, Jacksonville, for appellees.


SMITH, Judge.

Appellants appeal the trial court's order dismissing their professional malpractice suit against appellees. The trial court's order is based solely on the ground that appellants lacked privity with appellees and could not bring a legal malpractice action in that they did not come within the testamentary exception to the privity requirement. While ordinarily a party must share privity of contract with an attorney before he may bring suit for legal malpractice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases