STATE v. ROGERS

No. 91-561.

638 A.2d 569 (1993)

STATE of Vermont v. Candace and George A. ROGERS, Jr.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

December 27, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Atty. Gen., and Susan R. Harritt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montpelier, for plaintiff-appellee.

Richard A. Unger and Matthew Colburn, Montpelier, for defendants-appellants.

Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ.


DOOLEY, Justice.

Defendants Candace and George Rogers appeal the denial of their motion to suppress evidence obtained in a search of their home, arguing that the warrant under which the search was conducted was defective. Defendants assert that the visual observation of their garden, performed by a state trooper for the purpose of corroborating an anonymous tip that defendants were cultivating marijuana on their property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases