1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 195 A.D.2d
  5. 195 A.D.2d 1009 (1993)
 

MATTER OF COUNTY OF ONONDAGA v. HIAWATHA PLAZA ASSOCS.

195 A.D.2d 1009 (1993)

600 N.Y.S.2d 573

In the Matter of County of Onondaga, Appellant, v. Hiawatha Plaza Associates et al., Defendants, and Niagara Frontier Services, Inc., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

July 16, 1993

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Generally, an expert may be retained by only one side and an adversary should not seek his opponent's expert. The rationale for the rule is to avoid placing the expert in the unethical position of accepting retainers from both sides (see, Young v Strong, 118 A.D.2d 974, 976; Byczek v City of New York Dept. of Parks, 81 A.D.2d 823...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases