U.S. EX REL. VERDONE v. CIR. COURT FOR TAYLOR CTY.

No. 93-C-421-C.

851 F.Supp. 345 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America ex rel., Todd VERDONE pro per, Plaintiff, v. CIRCUIT COURT FOR TAYLOR COUNTY: Gary L. Carlson, Judge for Taylor County, Ronald Keberle, Reserve Judge for Carlson, Shawn Mutter, District Attorney, William Grunewald, Court Commissioner, Yvonne Bauer, Clerk of Circuit Court, Rose Thums, Deputy Clerk, Toni Mattias, Deputy Clerk, Margaret Gebauer, Deputy Clerk, Taylor County Sheriff Department: William Breneman, Sheriff, Norm Dassow, Detective for T.C.S.D., Nicholas R. Synol, Deputy Sheriff, Michael Johnson, Deputy Sheriff, David Kahn, Sgt. Deputy Sheriff, James Gorichs, Sgt. Deputy Sheriff, Michael Soto, Jailer, Medford City Police Department: Jack Kay, Chief of Police, Dan Olsen, Medford City Police Officer, Ted Bever, Medford City Police Officer, Gary Kreuger, Medford City Police Officer, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Division of Motor Vehicles: Roger D. Cross, Administrator, Wisconsin State Patrol: Marsha Whiley, Captain, Roger Herrell, Wisconsin State Patrol, and All Other Unnamed and/or Unknown Persons 1-500, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

December 29, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd Verdone, pro se.

James H. McDermott, Asst. Atty. Gen., Madison, WI, for Circuit Court for Taylor County, Gary L. Carlson, Ronald Keberle.

Jeffrey J. Strande, Wausau, WI, for William Grunewald, Yvonne Bauer, Rose Thums, Toni Mattias, Margaret Gebauer, Taylor County Sheriff Dept., William Breneman, Norm Dassow, Nicholas R. Synol, Michael Johnson, David Kahn, James Gorichs, Michael Soto.

Mary Batt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Madison, WI, for Shawn Mutter, Wisconsin Dept. of Transp., Roger D. Cross, Wisconsin State Patrol, Marsha Whiley, Roger Herrell.

Raymond G. Clausen, Stilp and Wells, Madison, WI, for Medford City Police Dept., Jack Kay, Dan Olsen, Ted Bever, Gary Kreuger.


OPINION and ORDER

CRABB, Chief Judge.

This is a civil action for monetary and injunctive relief. Although the allegations in plaintiff's complaint are difficult to follow, it appears that plaintiff seeks to challenge under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 a series of traffic court citations and convictions he has received. Apparently, plaintiff contends that these incidents comprised violations of his federal constitutional rights under the due process clause and his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases