Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: By his own testimony that the terms of his employment were within the discretion of his employer, defendant has conceded that he was an at-will employee. The court, therefore, erred in granting him judgment on his second counterclaim, which sought damages based on wrongful discharge (see, Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
INNOVATIVE CHEM. CORP. v. FRAZER
191 A.D.2d 1005 (1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 702
Innovative Chemical Corporation, Appellant, v. Richard Frazer, Jr., Respondent. (Appeal No. 1.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 12, 1993
March 12, 1993
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.