IN RE BROWNING-FERRIS SHAREHOLDERS DERIVATIVE LIT.

Civ. A. Nos. H-91-3142, H-91-3638 and H-91-3568.

830 F.Supp. 361 (1993)

In re BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.

March 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene A. Spector, Philadelphia, PA, Richard D. Greenfield, Greenfield & Chimicles, Haverford, PA, plaintiffs.

Rufus Wallingford, Fulbright & Jaworski, Houston, TX, Samuel J. Buffone, Ropes and Gray, Washington, DC, J. Eugene Clements, Porter & Clements, Houston, TX, W. Boone Vastine, II, Browning Ferris Industries, Houston, TX, for defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

This consolidated amended complaint alleges two claims for relief against the individual defendants, officers or members of the Board of Directors of Browning Ferris Industries ("BFI"). Plaintiffs, shareholders of BFI, allege proxy fraud under section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. sec. 78m(a) and Rule 14a-9, 17 C.F.R. § 240 (Count I), and under the disclosure requirements of Delaware...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases