PIPPIN v. LATOSYNSKI

Nos. 92-22, 92-1666.

622 So.2d 566 (1993)

Joseph Scott PIPPIN, Martha S. Davis, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Roger LATOSYNSKI, Appellee. Roger Latosynski, Appellant, v. Joseph Scott Pippin, Martha S. Davis, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 4, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Waylon Thompson of Boggs & Thompson, Panama City, for Pippin and Davis, appellants/appellees.

James B. Fensom of Barron, Redding, Hughes, Fite, Bassett & Fensom, P.A., Panama City, for State Farm Insurance, appellant/appellee.

Louis K. Rosenbloum and Stephen H. Echsner of Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A., Pensacola, for Latosynski, appellee/appellant.


MICKLE, Judge.

These consolidated appeals arise from a final judgment following a jury verdict in favor of Roger Latosynski in a personal injury action. Joseph Scott Pippin, Martha S. Davis, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, defendants below, argue that they are entitled to a new trial because the improper statements of plaintiff's counsel during closing argument constituted reversible error. We agree, and reverse. Latosynski, plaintiff below, appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases