RICKICKI v. BORDEN CHEM.


195 A.D.2d 986 (1993)

600 N.Y.S.2d 397

David Rickicki et al., Appellants, v. Borden Chemical, a Division of Borden, Inc., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

July 16, 1993


Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion granted and subpoena quashed.

Memorandum:

It is undisputed that the subpoena served upon the nonparty doctor did not contain nor was it accompanied by a notice stating "the circumstances or reasons such disclosure is sought or required" (CPLR 3101 [a] [4]). Thus, the subpoena was facially defective and may not be enforced (see, Matter of Yost v Douris,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases