1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 840 F.Supp.
  5. 840 F.Supp. 336 (1993)
 

KRAMER v. RAYMOND CORP.

Civ. No. 90-5026.

840 F.Supp. 336 (1993)

Philip KRAMER and Kathleen Kramer, Plaintiffs, v. RAYMOND CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

December 1, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathy M. Manderino, John A. Rothschild, Wendy Fleishman, Maureen A. Mahoney, Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiffs.

William J. Ricci, Thomas M. Hinchey, Thomas J. Bradley, Lavin, Coleman, Finarelli & Gray, Philadelphia, PA, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM/ORDER

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

On October 23, 1993, I ruled, inter alia, that the defendant Raymond Corporation was precluded from introducing evidence or otherwise suggesting that Philip Kramer's conduct in failing to look in the direction of travel and in placing his foot outside the forklift's operator compartment was the cause of his injuries. 840 F.Supp. 333. On November 15, 1993...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases