1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 985 F.2d
  5. 985 F.2d 185 (1993)
 

U.S. v. RINGLEY

No. 91-3002.

985 F.2d 185 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold L. RINGLEY; James E. Manicure, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided February 9, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Harvey Roberts, Wise, VA, argued, for defendants-appellants.

Mark Siegal, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Knoxville, TN, argued (John P. Alderman, U.S. Atty., Roanoke, VA, on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before RUSSELL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and KELLAM, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This case raises the issue of whether the general partners of a coal mining partnership may be held liable under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 for the partnership's unpaid reclamation fees after the individual partners' debts have been discharged in bankruptcy. The United States brought this action against the individual partners, Harold L. Ringley and James E. Manicure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases