STATE v. FURST

No. 92-2503.

622 So.2d 535 (1993)

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Mark FURST, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing, Clarification and Certification Denied September 9, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

H. Scott Hecker, Law Offices of H. Scott Hecker, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellee's speedy trial discharge because the trial court had the discretion to conclude on the record that the state had actual notice of, and intentionally ignored, Appellee's prematurely filed demand for reciprocal discovery. The demand was filed and served prior to the state's issuance of the formal information.

There is no indication or finding of intentional misconduct by the defense and the record supports Appellee's allegations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases