1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 995 F.2d
  5. 995 F.2d 161 (1993)
 

CHRISTENSEN v. YOLO COUNTY BD. OF SUP'RS

No. 91-16163.

995 F.2d 161 (1993)

Paul CHRISTENSEN; Candice Christensen; Eugene A. Dellavalle, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. YOLO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; Davis City Council, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Christensen, in pro per.

Paul A. Kramer, Jr., Asst. County Counsel, Woodland, CA, Harriet A. Steiner, McDonough, Holland & Allen, Sacramento, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Before: CHOY, NOONAN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs ("the Christensens") contend that defendants, by adopting a zoning agreement, (1) exercised a taking of their property in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments; (2) violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses; and (3) violated the Commerce Clause. Plaintiffs appeal pro se the district court's grant of defendants' motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs own a one...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases