INDEPENDENCE PUBLIC MEDIA v. PENNSYLVANIA PUB. TV

No. 92-0109.

813 F.Supp. 335 (1993)

INDEPENDENCE PUBLIC MEDIA OF PHILADELPHIA, INC. v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC TELEVISION NETWORK COMMISSION, et al.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

February 10, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric B. Schnurer, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff.

Calvin R. Koons, Office of Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, PA, for defendants Pennsylvania Public Television Network Com'n, H. Sheldon Parker, Jr., Bart H. Cavanagh, Sr., Joseph D. Hughes, Richard A. Stafford, Helen B. Craig, Sheldon P. Siegel.

Christopher K. Walters, Thomas J. Marshall, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Philadelphia, PA, Robert A. Woods, Schwartz, Woods & Miller, Washington, DC, for defendants, *419 Public Broadcasting of Northwest Pennsylvania, QED Communications, Inc., Lehigh Valley Telecommunications Corp., Northeastern Pennsylvania ETV Ass'n, Inc., WITF, Inc., Pennsylvania State University, WHYY, Inc.


MEMORANDUM

PADOVA, District Judge.

Defendants move to reconsider and vacate portions of my Opinion and Order of November 16, 1992 (the "Opinion"), 808 F.Supp. 416. For the following reasons, I will deny their motion.1

"The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence." Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases