ARMSTRONG v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

Civ. A. No. 89-142 (CRR).

810 F.Supp. 335 (1993)

Scott ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 6, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Tankersley, with Alan B. Morrison, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC, were on the briefs, for plaintiffs.

Jason R. Baron, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div., Washington, DC, with whom Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., District of Columbia, and David J. Anderson, Elizabeth A. Pugh, Peter D. Coffman, and Stephen G. Harvey, Attys., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div., Washington, DC, were on the briefs, for defendants.


                         TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.   INTRODUCTION ....................................................  337
II.  DISCUSSION ......................................................  339
     A. THE STATUTORY COMMAND FROM 1943 THROUGH THE LAST
         AMENDMENT BY CONGRESS IN 1984 SHOWS A CLEAR LEGISLATIVE
         PURPOSE THAT RECORDS OF HISTORICAL VALUE
         INVOLVING THE PUBLIC, REGARDLESS OF PHYSICAL FORM,
         SHALL BE PRESERVED, PARTICULARLY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases