CASEY v. CASEY

No. 23822.

428 S.E.2d 714 (1993)

Joyce Miller CASEY, Appellant, v. John William CASEY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided March 15, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene F. Rogers and D. Randolph Whitt, Sherill, and Rogers, P.C., Columbia, for appellant.

James H. Lengel, Columbia, for respondent.


TOAL, Justice:

The issue presented in this appeal is whether an equitable distribution award is a money decree or a judgment, pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 34-31-20 (1987), so that it accrues interest at the statutorily prescribed post-judgment rate of 14%. We see no reason to distinguish equitable distribution money awards from other money judgments. Accordingly, we reverse the family court's denial of post-judgment interest of 14%.

FACTS

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases