CONLEY v. SHUTTS & BOWEN, P.A.

No. 92-407.

616 So.2d 523 (1993)

Daniel CONLEY, Appellant, v. SHUTTS & BOWEN, P.A., and Mark Bisbing, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied May 11, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Perse & Ginsberg and Edward Perse, Ratiner & Glinn, Miami, for appellant.

Murai, Wald, Biondo & Moreno and Marianne A. Vos, Miami, for appellees.

Before BASKIN, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Daniel Conley appeals an order dismissing with prejudice a legal malpractice action he filed against Shutts & Bowen, P.A., a law firm, and Mark Bisbing, an attorney employed by Shutts & Bowen.

Conley acted as the withholding agent, for Internal Revenue Service [IRS] purposes, in a transaction involving the sale of certain notes and mortgages. Defendants advised Conley concerning his tax obligations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases