ISENHOUR v. UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INS. CO.

No. 9325SC97.

437 S.E.2d 702 (1993)

113 N.C. App. 152

Dallas L. ISENHOUR and wife, Sandra K. Isenhour v. UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY and Universal Underwriters Group.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 21, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pritchett, Cooke & Burch by David J. Irvine, Jr., Windsor, and Lovekin & Ingle, P.A. by Stephen L. Lovekin and John D. Ingle, Hickory, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Hutchins, Tyndall, Doughton & Moore by Richard Tyndall and Kent L. Hamrick, Winston-Salem, for defendants-appellees.


ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in allowing defendants' motion for summary judgment. Defendants, on the other hand, contend that summary judgment should be affirmed because the trial court correctly applied this Court's decision in Watson. Defendants are correct.

Defendants submitted two affidavits in support of their motion for summary judgment. In the first affidavit, Universal's underwriting manager stated that Universal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases