1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 986 F.2d
  5. 986 F.2d 151 (1993)
 

U.S. v. MORGAN

Nos. 91-2402, 92-1092.

986 F.2d 151 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Janese MORGAN, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided February 19, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan Tukel (argued and briefed), Office of U.S. Atty., Detroit, MI, for plaintiff-appellee, cross-appellant.

James J. Hoare (argued and briefed), Hoare & Lyda, Farmington Hills, MI, for defendant-appellant, cross-appellee.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge, and KENNEDY and GUY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Janese Morgan, appeals the district court's refusal to make a downward departure at sentencing. Morgan also urges on appeal that the trial judge abused his discretion in failing to "individualize" her sentence to include alternate forms of incarceration along with regular incarceration.

The government has filed a cross-appeal, claiming the district judge erred in not enhancing defendant's sentence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases