1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 859 S.W.2d
  5. 859 S.W.2d 271 (1993)
 

LEHNIG v. BORNHOP

No. 62856.

859 S.W.2d 271 (1993)

Rudy LEHNIG and Kay Lehnig, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Norbert BORNHOP and Frank Conard, Defendants/Respondents.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

August 24, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rochelle Ann Kaskowitz, St. Louis, for plaintiffs, appellants.

Frank Arthur Conard, St. Charles, for defendants, respondents.

CRAHAN, Judge.

Rudy and Kay Lehnig ("Plaintiffs") appeal from the trial court's order sustaining Norbert Bornhop and Frank Conard's ("Defendants") motion to dismiss their claims with prejudice on the ground that they were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.

In reviewing the dismissal of a petition, we allow the pleading its broadest intendment, treat all facts alleged as true...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases