1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 840 F.Supp.
  5. 840 F.Supp. 285 (1993)
 

IN RE IN-STORE ADVERTISING SECURITIES LITIGATION

No. 90 CIV. 5594 (KC).

840 F.Supp. 285 (1993)

In re IN-STORE ADVERTISING SECURITIES LITIGATION.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sharon Levine Mirsky, Milberg Weiss Bershad Specthrie & Lerach, New York City.

Marian P. Rosner, Wolf Popper Ross Wolf & Jones, New York City.

Peter Cooper, Baer Marks & Upham, New York City.

Frank M. Holozubiec, Kirkland & Ellis, New York City.

Matthew Gluck, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson, New York City.

Dennis J. Block, Weil Gotshal & Manges, New York City.

Sid Davis, Davis Markel & Edwards, New York City.

OPINION and ORDER

CONBOY, District Judge:

Pending before the Court is the summary judgment motion of defendant KPMG Peat Marwick ("Peat Marwick"), which seeks to dismiss plaintiffs' federal and state law securities fraud claims on the ground that they are time-barred. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted with respect to the federal claims and denied without prejudice with respect to the state...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases