1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 616 So.2d
  5. 616 So.2d 505 (1993)
 

SKOPIT v. NEISEN

No. 92-1825.

616 So.2d 505 (1993)

Stanley SKOPIT, D.O., Appellant, v. Patricia NEISEN and Sidney Neisen, her husband, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied May 11, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walton Lantaff Schroeder & Carson, and Robert L. Teitler, Miami, for appellant.

Smith & Gellman, Miami, Don Russo, and Elizabeth Koebel Russo, Coconut Grove, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court's order granting a new trial. Since the jury never reached the issue of apportioning damages, any error on the verdict form was harmless. The asserted juror misconduct, if true, was not material to this case, and, thus did not warrant a new trial. See Blaylock v. State, 537 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), review denied, 547 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 1989). Finally, because the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases