HALL, Judge.
The appellant, Fran Dorff, challenges an order entered by the appellee, the Unemployment Appeals Commission (UAC), reversing an appeals referee's finding that Dorff is entitled to receive unemployment benefits. Dorff essentially contends that the appeals referee correctly found that there was insufficient evidence to establish that she was guilty of misconduct in connection with her work. Dorff therefore argues that the UAC erred in reversing the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.