Defendant contends that the People violated the terms of the plea agreement by failing to recommend that his sentence run concurrently with a previously imposed term of imprisonment and that the sentence of 2 1/3 to 7 years to be served consecutively to his previously imposed sentence is harsh and excessive. A review of the transcripts of the plea and sentencing minutes reveals that the People adhered to their promise not to object to a concurrent sentence (see,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SIPLEY
196 A.D.2d 910 (1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 222
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin M. Sipley, Also Known as Kevin M. Reed, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 23, 1993
September 23, 1993
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
