Defendant contends on this appeal that the sentence of 3 to 9 years' imprisonment that he received should be reduced because it is disproportionate to the sentence of 3½ to 7 years' imprisonment imposed upon a codefendant and because it is harsh and excessive. The fact that defendant did not receive the same sentence as a codefendant does not require modification of his sentence (see, People v Warden,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.