1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 836 F.Supp.
  5. 836 F.Supp. 252 (1993)
 

RICHARDSON v. DIAGNOSTIC REHABILITATION CENTER

Civ. A. No. 92-5649.

836 F.Supp. 252 (1993)

Robert RICHARDSON v. DIAGNOSTIC REHABILITATION CENTER.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

July 27, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Richardson, pro se.

Rachel S. Lieberman, Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, PA, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

GILES, District Judge.

Defendant has moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The allegations of the complaint, which we assume to be true for the purposes of deciding this motion to dismiss, see, e.g., Jenkins v. McKeithen,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases