Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial as a result of the alleged violation by the prosecutor of the trial court's Sandoval ruling. We disagree. The cross-examination of a defendant in regard to matters precluded by the trial court's Sandoval ruling constitutes error (see, People v Wilkens,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.