KELLY v. CONNECTICUT MUT. LIFE INS. CO.

1920618, 1920717 and 1920861.

628 So.2d 454 (1993)

John S. KELLY v. CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. Mark WILL v. CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Michael P. KILCULLEN v. CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and H. Brantley Sanders.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C.S. Chiepalich and Richard M. Beckish of C.S. Chiepalich, P.C., Mobile, for appellants.

Davis Carr and James W. Lampkin of Pierce, Carr & Alford, P.C., Mobile, for appellees.


SHORES, Justice.

This opinion addresses three separate actions against Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company. John S. Kelly and Mark Will appeal from summary judgments in favor of Connecticut Mutual in their separate actions; and Michael P. Kilcullen appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Connecticut Mutual and H. Brantley Sanders. We affirm all three judgments.

"A summary judgment is proper when there exists no genuine issue of material fact and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases