U.S. v. DIXON

No. 92-1111.

1 F.3d 1080 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lewis Nathaniel DIXON, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

August 2, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Norton, U.S. Atty., and John M. Hutchins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Mountain States Drug Task Force, Denver, CO, for plaintiff-appellee.

Lewis Nathaniel Dixon, pro se.

Before ANDERSON and EBEL, Circuit Judges, and BRIMMER, District Judge.


EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Lewis Nathaniel Dixon filed a pro se motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, claiming that the district court erred at trial when it denied his motion to suppress evidence allegedly obtained from an unlawful search and seizure, and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel on appeal because counsel failed to raise the suppression issue. The district court denied the motion. We affirm.

On December 5, 1989, federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases