1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 13 Cal.App.4th
  5. 13 Cal.App.4th 1061 (1993)
 

LARA v. CADAG

Docket No. B051410.

13 Cal.App.4th 1061 (1993)

16 Cal. Rptr.2d 811

ANA LARA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SANTIAGO CADAG, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

February 25, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Chelski, Hammock & Hedges and Randolph M. Hammock for Defendant and Appellant.

John F. Shoosmith, Jr., for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.

The question before us is whether a plaintiff in pursuit of an award of punitive damages can satisfy her obligation to present evidence of the defendant's financial condition without some proof of his net worth or something akin to "net worth." We hold that where, as here, the evidence is limited to proof of the defendant's annual income, there is insufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases